Given the recent protests and riots in some countries, there is a lot of discussion around the pros and cons of police wearing body cameras. Public perception varies as police weigh up the benefits of using body cameras when on duty. Body cameras worn by the police serve two purposes; one they improve officer safety and communication when working in stressful environments and secondly in the event where a situation gets out of hand and people are injured or lives lost, they help to provide a factual account of what happened.
New research sponsored by the National Institute of Justice determines that, in Las Vegas, body-worn cameras benefit the officers who wear them and the public they serve.
NIJ collaborated with the Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department, the CNA Institute for Public Research, Northeastern University, and the University of Nevada, Las Vegas, on this major study, which consisted of a 12-month randomized control experiment involving 416 officers.
“When we first proposed the idea of body-worn cameras, our officers were reticent,” said Sheriff Joe Lombardo of the LVMPD. “They were fearful that the cameras would be too intrusive on their job. What they quickly found out was that [the camera] became their best eyewitness.
“The camera serves as a tool to pull back the curtain on some of the situations our officers face and gives them an unvarnished view of incidents that are of great public interest. The outcome has allowed us to become more transparent and build trust with the public.”
The study found that police are more proactive in preventing crime when they wear a camera. The cameras were found to provide compelling evidence to build legal cases, and their use largely affirmed and validated positive officer behavior. Members of the public submitted fewer complaints of officer misconduct, and the video record protected police from frivolous complaints. Officers who wore them were less likely, by more than 14 percent, to be called out in citizen complaints than those who did not.
Body-worn cameras also reduced use-of-force incidents. Combined with fewer complaints, this means that less time and money were spent on investigations ??? translating into significant cost savings. The study estimates net savings per camera-wearing officer to fall between $2,909 and $3,178 annually.
The findings reveal that body-worn cameras can help police on a number of levels: better evidence for cases that progress to courts; more relevant training based on analysis of captured footage; rapid resolution of complaints, due to the existence of video evidence; and law enforcement’s increased transparency with the public. The work done in this study is helpful not only in Las Vegas but to law enforcement, communities, and policymakers across the country.
JIMI B9 4G Body Camera. Featuring 4K video recording and IR-cut up to 10 meters, B9 4G body camera enables an operator to get complete situational awareness in most law-enforcement scenarios via 4G, 3G and Wi-Fi connectivity. and outfitted with a dual-battery design, B9 4G body camera can record continuous video for 8 hours without interruption and support QC3.0 meeting 2 hours of fast filling, making it a perfect choice for police officers.
Learn more about the body-worn camera for police at https://www.jimisecu.com/b9-4g-body-camera/